Run some hairy test cases and evaluate the outputs for, e.g., completeness, 
effort for manual recodeing of anything not automatically converted, 
efficiency, readability, maintainability. It's a lot harder to do it well than 
to just do it. Using a program that only translates 75% of a module might 
require more manpower than translating the whole thing manually.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Tom 
Ross [tmr...@stlvm20.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, July 8, 2022 6:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Converting assembler to COBOL help

Greetings mainframers!

This has porobbaly been asked and answered, but are there tools or companies
that can convert or help to rewrite assembler applications or just programs
into COBOL?  Any suggestions?


Cheers,
TomR              >> COBOL is the Language of the Future! <<
AKA:  Captain COBOL, Tom Ross

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to