On Sun, 15 Jan 2023 20:51:20 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote: > ... >I guess this mostly article-free English is trying to say that an >unspecified field in the ASCB points to something above the line, rather >than that the ASCB itself is above the line. > Even so, there should never have been a need to operate in AMODE 24. AMODE 31 supports accessing storage below-the-line.
Was it lazy code to avoid purifying an impure 24-bit address? >IHAASCB still says that the ASCB is below the line, and I think a ton of >stuff would break it was moved above. That's what the ASSB is for. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
