Do you really think you're accomplishing anything by getting personally
insulting?  ...that is, beyond destroying your own credibility and
potential future job prospects? If I was looking at your resume, I'd think
twice about keeping it instead of sticking it in the nearest shredder.

On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 11:17 PM Jon Perryman <jperr...@pacbell.net> wrote:

>  > On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 04:33:30 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz <
> sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
> > I'm perfectly willing to be civil with people who are civil,
>
> If I'm continually "wrong again", how is it that we arrived at the
> solution? Does anyone think that Seymour was leading Phil towards a
> solution to his problem? I'm civil to those who earn and demonstrate
> respect instead of demanding it. Lack of humility and the inability to
> understand the value of what others say is not a sign of respect. To
> prattle on about complete nonsense is not a sign of respect. What in any
> way was Seymour's comments being useful or informative? With the help of
> others, I was able to lead Phil to a solution for his problem and a
> solution he understands. I have no doubt that Seymour thinks he played a
> vital role in solving this problem but as he says, the devils in the
> details. I don't expect people to have all the correct answers but I do
> expect humility and respect for everyone in this group (not just me).
> Disagreements are expected but complete dismissal is not acceptable. I will
> show respect as long as respect is returned. As long as everyone is being
> respected, I will return that respect. Time will tell if Seymour has
> actually learned from what I've said.
>
> Please accept my apologies for those who are upset with me but there is a
> line that I will not allow to be crossed without some form of retribution.
>
>     On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 04:33:30 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz <
> sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
>
>  I'm perfectly willing to be civil with people who are civil, but when
> someone insists on repeated personal attacks. Take a look at the history of
> this thread and you will see that I have been restrained by comparison.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf
> of Jay Maynard <jaymayn...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 6:47 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Ignorant z/OS question
>
> Now folks...let's not descend into personal name-calling, how about?
>
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 4:56 PM Jon Perryman <jperr...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> >  > On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 02:10:11 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz <
> > sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
> > > Wrong again. When running z/OS under VM for production, multiple 3270
> > consoles is the norm.
> >
> > See-more Putz. What are you saying is wrong with my second sentence that
> > says "z/OS has many consoles." which applies to native and z/VM. Can you
> > stop with the non-stop nonsense.
> >
> >    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 02:10:11 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz <
> > sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
> >
> >  Wrong again. When running z/OS under VM for production, multiple 3270
> > consoles is the norm.
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf
> > of Jon Perryman <jperr...@pacbell.net>
> > Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 5:04 PM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: Ignorant z/OS question
> >
> >  > On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 01:24:04 PM PDT, Phil Smith III <
> > li...@akphs.com> wrote:
> > > After changing the virtual console address from 03E1 to 0009
> > > linemode output went to SECUSER without artifacts
> >
> >
> > Congrats Phil. Here is what you need to know:
> >
> > 1. z/OS has many consoles. You don't have any consoles activated. The
> > hardware console is DEV(SYSCONS) in PARMLIB(CONSOL##) which has nothing
> to
> > do with DEV(3E1) in CONSOL##.
> >
> > 2. DEV(SYSCONS) will stop working if a DEV(###) regardless how the
> > terminal is defined (DEF CONS, DEF GRAF or ATTACH). If someone decides
> they
> > need a console located next to the tape drives and another console next
> to
> > printers, then DEV(SYSCONS) will no longer be automatically activated.
> >
> > 3. Virtual CONSOLE DEV(###) should never be used for z/OS. The default
> for
> > screen full with non-autoscroll messages requires a real person clear the
> > screen. This VM user typically would not be logged on. It could be days
> or
> > weeks before someone notices the message backlog.
> >    On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 01:24:04 PM PDT, Phil Smith III <
> > li...@akphs.com> wrote:
> >
> >  After changing the virtual console address from 03E1 (matching the
> > CONSOLE entry in CONSOLxx) to 0009 (matching no z/OS console definition)
> > and reIPLing the guest, the linemode output went to SECUSER without
> > artifacts, as it did on our old hosting environment.
> >
> > I'm convinced based on the evidence that:
> >
> > *    The old environment had the virtual console at 0009
> > *    The old environment had the z/OS CONSOLE definition at 03E1
> > *    The folks who ported our system over for us had logon access to the
> > old environment, but did NOT have access to the VM directory entry for
> the
> > guest
> > *    They thus made the logically correct decision to define the virtual
> > console at 03E1
> >
> >
> > That was the "right thing to do", except it turned out to change the
> > behavior in an unintuitive way. Now we know.
> >
> > Thanks 10**6 for all the thoughts and advice here! It was a bit of an
> > odyssey but we got there.
> >
> > And this might be due an IBM-MAIN award for the longest thread without
> > significant topic drift, at least in a while. No idea why, but that's
> rare
> > here!
> >
> > ...phsiii
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
>
> --
> Jay Maynard
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 
Jay Maynard

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to