I just found some old JCL for EasyProc and sure enough, it's coded like:
//PROCLIB DD DSN=TED013.PROCLIB,DISP=SHR
... with a DD. But that doesn't mean it went through standard DD
allocation. All this happened early in the JCL scanning and conversion.
The "DD" and maybe even the DISP=SHR was probably just for consistency.
On 8/31/2023 10:38 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 17:19:38 +0000, Pommier, Rex wrote:
Yeah, I don't understand why IBM didn't just use DD card syntax instead of
coming up with this.
I conjecture sequence of operations. DD statements aren't elaborated until
job initiation. JCLLIB is needed earlier. Isn't there a similar requirement
for
PROCLIB?
gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
