And so we can now understand that when a paralegal or newly
minted attorney uses it to find case law for points and
authorities, it will will make them up to match what was being
searched for when it prepares a motion it was asked for using the
results of the search.
And some attorneys got a judge quite angry with them when they
didn't tell the court this, but the opposing council pointed out
they could not find any such case listed in the pleadings/motion.
Then the judge's people also could not find same.... This is the
kind of thing that concerns me about AI today. Once it has been
taught enough to learn on its own....
Steve Thompson
On 9/5/2023 12:46 PM, Dean Kent wrote:
I spent a bit of time playing with chatGPT to see what it could
do. So did my two sons - one an MS in biotech, the other a
PhD in theoretical physics. We all came to the same
conclusion - chatGPT is a very, very good Google search that
can filter many different possible 'answers' and come to one
that is 'most likely' based on various factors. It has little
to no creativity or understanding of what it is asked to do.
Not surprising, but different than what the popular press seems
to say about it.
One of my questions was to write a simple sort routine in
HLASM. It came back with a template containing the entry/exit
code, and then a comment *insert sort routine here*. After
doing that with many different simple tasks, I came to the
conclusion that the problem chatGPT has with assembler (but not
with C, Python, Java, etc.) is that there are so few searchable
examples of code in assembler. So the quality of the
results, for any question, depends upon what exists out on the
Internet. Again, not surprising.
As another example, I have an interest in what is called
'historical analysis'. There are a number of books on the
subject, so I asked chatGPT to compare/contrast two of the
books. Then two other books, etc. In literally every case
it came back with the same introductory text and conclusion -
but inserted a couple of paragraphs that was similar to a book
review for each book and compared the 'differences'. Not very
impressed.
My PhD son uses it to find obscure hypotheses and formulas that
would otherwise require a great many hours (or days) of
searching. My MS son uses it in a similar fashion to ferret
out alternative options for the various cell growing and
protein extraction for his job. A very useful tool, but not
yet SkyNet...
YMMV.
On 9/5/2023 9:36 AM, Bill Johnson wrote:
We are all retired. The other 2 went before me. I went in
July 2022. You’re an idiot regardless. What are you afraid of?
That a computer can do what you do? That your “skills” aren’t
all that impressive and can be automated away?
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023, 12:25 PM, David Spiegel
<00000468385049d1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
Hi Bill,
I have a better idea.
Why don't you and the 2 buddies who helped you modify the
IEFUSI fix it?
Probably because you don't have the wherewithal (even with 2
helpers).
Regards,
David
On 2023-09-05 12:04, Bill Johnson wrote:
Lol, how about going to chatgpt and asking the same question.
So that cut and paste isn’t a factor.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Tuesday, September 5, 2023, 12:02 PM, David Spiegel
<00000468385049d1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
Hi Steve,
It won't. The first executable statement is missing a comma
between
operands.
Regards,
David
On 2023-09-05 11:43, Steve Thompson wrote:
I doubt it will assemble. And even if it does, the results are
unpredictable, other than it will probably ABEND for one
reason or
another.
There are no DCB, OPEN, CLOSE macros while GET and PUT are
being used.
Me thinks this AI system is confusing a few different assembly
languages together. I wonder how close they came for DOS I/O.
Steve Thompson
On 9/5/2023 11:20 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
You're right, Tom. That is not a program. Certainly not one
that will
do what it claims to do.
-- Tom Marchant On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 10:42:51 -0700, Tom Brennan
<t...@tombrennansoftware.com> wrote:
I can't be sure I formatted it properly, but after looking
over the
code, I have nothing to say but WTF? 😄
PRINT NOGEN
TITLE 'Simple Addition Program'
** Define storage for input numbers and result
*
NUM1 DS F First input number
NUM2 DS F Second input number
RESULT DS F Result of addition
** Main program
*
MAIN C 0 NUM1 Check if NUM1 is zero
BE ZERO Branch to ZERO if true
** Read the first number from input
*
GET NUM1,NUMIN Read NUM1 from input
LA 0,NUM1 Load NUM1 into register
** Read the second number from input
*
GET NUM2,NUMIN Read NUM2 from input
A NUM1,NUM2 Add NUM1 and NUM2
ST NUM1,RESULT Store the result in
RESULT
** Print the result
*
PUT RESULT,NUMOUT Print the result
** Terminate the program
*
SR 15,15 Set return code to 0
BR 14 Return to caller
** Define input and output areas
*
NUMIN DC F'0' Input buffer for numbers
NUMOUT DC F'0' Output buffer for result
ZERO DC F'0' Constant zero
END MAIN End of program
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
instructions,
send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:
INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:
INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
IBM-MAIN
--
Regards,
Steve Thompson
VS Strategies LLC
Westfield IN
972-983-9430 cell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN