Here's some more info. I've got a volume, that is online to our production lpar and one of our test lpars. If I run a full volume dump on my test lpar, it uses 6.88 seconds of cpu time. If I run the job on my production lpar, it uses 20.86 cpu seconds.
Using Mainview and doing a trace of where it's spending it's time, the test lpar trace shows that it is approx 62% of the samples were in IECVPST, followed by 11.7% in IAXPQ, then 10.4% in ADRDTDS, etc. On my production lpar, the order is completely different, with 39% being in IAXPN, then 34% in IAXPQ then 11% in ADRDTDS and only 8% in IECVPST. Why is it spending so much time in the IAXPN/IAXPQ modules? Peter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
