For services entered with a branch or jump, the save baarea is also relevant.

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of 
Joseph Reichman <reichman...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 8:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: sdwagrsv not equal rbgrsave

I had two main objectives in updating file 192

First in amode 64 display 64 gpr

Second when a abend occurs in a IBM service

Be it PC or SVC

Report on where in the user program this occurred

For SVC this would be in the RB

For PC ( which are normally space switching as well as stacking )

In the linkage stack

Sdwaec2 doesn’t have 64 bit gpr but they exist in the linkage stack

Thanks

> On Jan 23, 2024, at 2:31 AM, Jon Perryman <jperr...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 05:08:17 +0000, Peter Relson <rel...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> <snip>
>> I chain backward as its  the only way to do it wrapping around tcbrbp and 
>> next rb had the registers in the prefix it had SVC 12 maybe SVC 42 issued 
>> that
>> </snip>
>>
>> "Wrapping around tcbrbp" is a strange way to do much of anything.
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Joseph is updating the abend recovery provided on the CBT available for 
> public consumption. IBM abend does not always display abend module with 
> offset. He is going to great lengths to obtain this information when not 
> provided or when SDWAEC2 is different from SDWAEC1.
>
> I doubt that any vendor would do this because of possible risks. Having 
> worked on critical software, the benefit never justified the risk of 
> crippling a customer's system.
>
> I only mention this because you may have some tips for him. For instance, 
> Wrapping around TCBRBP is his method for locating the module. Are there 
> situations where the overhead could be problematic or worse yet a true 
> multi-active task environment encountering problems such as an RB being 
> removed. UNIX, CICS and OEM products.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to