You are correct. It's on the same piece of silicon NOW. My original point is still good. I don't understand why there is a focus on a minor detail of the physical layout of the chip.
Correcting my original statement. "The CPACF is a PIECE OF THE CP that runs in lockstep with the CP that invokes it. So, it is does cost general CP but much less than implementing it in millicode." Eric Rossman -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Martin Packer Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 10:39 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Encryption and decryption - processor or TCPIP If I'm interpreting the z16 materials right it's within the core's area. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
