Did new catalog keep and then freed was still there Maybe sonme how there was abend that wasn’t displayed and as the last parameter was delete it deleted
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 12:36 PM Paul Gilmartin < [email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 11:05:17 -0500, Charles Mills wrote: > > >ALLOC may well take whatever you specify last and ignore what came before > -- I don't know. NEW CATLG DELETE is adding to the confusion. Try just NEW > CATLG. > > > Taking the last of conflicting options is typical UNIX behavior. > But many participants of this forum despise all things UNIX. > > Is this documented for ALLOCATE, or in the frontmatter for > TSO commands generally. Particular mention is needed > where TSO behavior differs from the expectation of > JCL programmers. > > -- > gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
