On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 09:56:43 +0300, Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 14:32:43 -0500 Jon Perryman <[email protected]> wrote: >:>Most if not all professional products have an infrastructure >Only if documented as such. Product infrastructure is developed by the product or company. Documentation is at the discretion of the company. >A high performance path that can piggyback on >storage available but not the 18/36 words should not do the STORAGE call >simply to look nice. "piggyback on storage available" is one high performance solution but is not the only solution. Even with severely restricted storage, there are methods that don't require storage obtain but make additional storage available when needed. "look nice" is a misnomer. Consistency avoid errors when working in teams. There are methods to reduce the cost of maintaining consistency. >even 72/144 bytes add up, which is why ATTACH(X) has the SVAREA parameter). Today, 144 additional bytes per task is insignificant. I suspect that the real impact today is with z/OS Unix with a significant number of very short term processes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
