On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 at 16:02, Jon Perryman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 21:14:35 +0200, salva <[email protected]> wrote: > > >call bpxwdyn "alloc fi(myterm) tu(0028)" > > DSN(*) should have work because of SVC screening but I'm guessing the op > tried it and it failed. How does SVC screening come into this picture? Using SVC99 DALTERM is the obvious answer. Was it obvious to you before someone else made the point that bpxwdyn allows explicit text units to be specified? > Out of curiosity, I had a quick chat with claude.ai about svc99 instead > of BPXWDYN. It happily generated the correct assembler code and offered > DSN(*) as an alternative. AI knows about DALTERM which caused the leap to > TERMINAL https://claude.ai/share/b9da7da8-f0ef-454a-be99-bed0c54091f2 It also seems to believe that issuing DYNALLOC instead of SVC 99 avoids the need to set up the SVC 99 arguments. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
