>From where I stand: a simple question calls for a simple fix. But nooo, it’s always got to be “make it harder than it really is”! Why use a plain command when you can write some low-level assembler to do exactly the same thing? This forum, once an oracle of wisdom, is quickly turning into a nightmare of toxicity and oversized egos.
El mié, 10 sept 2025, 15:44, Charles Mills <[email protected]> escribió: > Problem is long since solved but FWIW. > > On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 18:44:03 -0500, Glenn Knickerbocker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >It's a big *IF*, but: If whatever you're using will know how to write to > a Unix file, that seems a lot less arcane than hunting down text unit types. > > - "Hunting down" the text unit is not really an issue. @salva was kind > enough to suggest TU(0021) and that's about all of the hunting that was > required. Well, okay, I did look it up. > - If you allocate the UNIX path to a DD then a program has to kind of go > out of its way to NOT work with the UNIX path. > > Charles > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
