I'm wondering if CEE05101x and CEE5101x aren't the same animal. When is a leading zero significant? I don't see any CEE messages with more than 4 digits.
I dearly wish LE (C/C++) return value/reason codes were documented with their numeric values, instead of having to relate a header file to a member in SCEEH.H and work it out for yourself... Ant. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of nitz-...@gmx.net Sent: Friday, 21 June 2013 6:40 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: abendu4080 reasonCEE05101 Miklos, > If you get a DUMP, there should be an "Errnojr" field ("error > information" title), maybe it contains the errno and errno2. where exactly would I find that? I have several dumps to choose from, and even formatting ledata from that dump doesn't cough out any such field. The dump title was chosen by LE and is Dump Title: JOBNAME xxxxx STEPNAME yyyyyyyy USER 4080 This is NOT a dump written by Unix system services, it is written by LE, and the calling sequence leads me to believe that LE wants to output a message that it cannot find. Neither can I. Hence my question. At least I hope that I have now persuaded DAE to suppress further useless transaction dumps of this type. Lizette, in your quote you omitted the explanation how the reason code would get translated into an LE-Message. I cannot find the message the reason code (CEE05101) translates to. In addition, we are neither in initiation of an LE enclave nor in termination, as far as I can see in the dump. Barbara ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
