Jon, I'm happy with it being informational. I don't feel it should have been a warning. The doc says that FLAG suppresses informational, but we've seen evidence that it doesn't. So it's either a doc erorr or a bug. Either way, an ETR is in order.
In article <1382109871.74071.yahoomail...@web181003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> you wrote: > FLAG does not suppress informational messages (BLS18064I No symbols found). > You may feel it should have been a warning but IBM classified it as > informational. > Jon Perryman. > >________________________________ > > From: Don Poitras <poit...@pobox.com> > > > > > >From the book: > > > >The FLAG severity parameters and the messages transmitted follow. > >WARNING is the IPCS-defined default. > >... > >TERMINATING > >? Transmits only TERMINATING messages and suppresses INFORMATIONAL, > >? WARNING, ERROR, and SERIOUS (SEVERE) messages. -- Don Poitras - SAS Development - SAS Institute Inc. - SAS Campus Drive sas...@sas.com (919) 531-5637 Cary, NC 27513 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
