On 24 Dec 2013 15:25:48 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: Subject line says it all. My understanding of most discussions here is that the answer is yes. Then the second question is whether this is logically code that would have run authorized anyway?
Clark Morris >In <8p0ka91p0u2h3skg8nklk9o1sbmk4co...@4ax.com>, on 12/12/2013 > at 02:47 PM, Clark Morris <cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca> said: > >>If the only code that is aimed for zAAP or zIIP is code that would >>have run authorized anyway, then no additional exposure is caused >>by their use. > >That would be true if there were never any programming errors. Errors >in code running key 0 and supervisor are more likely to cause serious >problems than errors in AC(1) code running key 8 and problem. > >>In regard to COBOL, I believe have seen things that say that XML >>services used by COBOL can run on a zAAP so the question comes as >>to whether these services would have to run authorized anyway. > >My reading is that unauthorized code does a PC to invoke the service. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
