On 2014-01-17 13:04, zMan wrote: > Ooh, ooh! Now we can fight over top-posting vs. bottom-posting! And > indent(at)ion! And HTML vs plaintext. > Hasn't LISTSERV settled by fiat the HTML question? I post responses close to and following the quoted text.
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Vernooij, CP (SPLXM) - KLM wrote: > >> The way I read the messages in this thread is in a unknown, garbage order >> (probably sorted in some time format, with no relation to the local time >> the messages was sent in). >> >> In the case of this reply, I have no idea what the interesting idea was. >> Please quote the text you are referring to. +1 Also, trim stale text, LISTSERV footers and legal disclaimers. *But* leave enough header information (Date: and From:) as citation so the readercan refer to the full text of the cited article in the Archives. (Shmuel will pay no attention.) -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
