edja...@phoenixsoftware.com (Ed Jaffe) writes: > Naturally, the laws of physics dictate the notion of a capture ratio > will always exist, but the "uncaptured" problem has been minimized and > for many is no longer worthy of serious concern.
re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014b.html#78 CPU time http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014b.html#80 CPU time http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014b.html#81 CPU time http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014b.html#82 CPU time http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014b.html#83 CPU time http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014b.html#84 CPU time still in r13, this mention what to do if your capture ratio is below 80% http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r13/topic/com.ibm.zos.r13.erba900/erbzpm9056.htm definately better than the days when it could be less than 40% and the "analyzing processor characteristics" in r13 doesn't appear to have changed http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r13/topic/com.ibm.zos.r13.erba900/erbzpm9029.htm although this reference in r13 documentation has refs from r11 system http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r13/topic/com.ibm.zos.r13.erba900/erbzpm9041.htm but the capture ratio section seems to be r13 system and has example of 71% ... but comment is that most systems should be better than 80% ... again lot better than the days of 40% "Capacity Planning" SHARE presentation still discusses that low and/or varying capture ratio is problem https://share.confex.com/share/119/webprogram/Handout/Session11598/capplan_mistakes.pdf -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
