Hello,
I've noticed a strange dss behavior and want ask explanation:
After I finished dss backup, I always received a message similar to this:
 15.29.56 JOB31114  IEC205I ODD,BKDS,BACKUP,FILESEQ=1, COMPLETE VOLUME LIST,  
870
    870             DSN=BKUP.D003,VOLS=PT0541,TOTALBLOCKS=12122

Is the block counts reported the real tape blocks written to tape or something 
else?

I've noticed that for BASIC PS and extended format PS, it is different,below is 
my testing:
st_TIME end_TIME        backup source data type VOLSER  VTV size(mb)    VTV 
size(comp)(mb)      tape block size(KB)     Total block count reported by DSS
11:31:41        11:33:12        Extended format compressed      PT3968  1854.15 
647.77  128     33879
11:33:12        11:34:42        Extended format compressed      PT3974  1854.15 
647.77  64      33879
11:34:42        11:36:17        Extended format compressed      PT3976  1854.15 
647.77  256     33879
12:22:50        12:31:20        Extended format PT4034  6280.18 371.56  128     
223678
12:31:20        12:39:35        Extended format PT4043  6280.18 371.56  64      
223678
12:39:35        12:47:58        Extended format PT4053  6280.18 371.56  256     
223678
12:55:09        12:58:34        Basic PS,compressed     PT4065  6273.86 360.15  
128     49115
12:58:34        13:03:06        Basic PS,compressed     PT4067  6274.57 367.9   
64      98428
13:03:06        13:05:59        Basic PS,compressed     PT4072  6273.51 355.32  
256     24527
13:08:07        13:11:37        Basic PS        PT4075  6273.86 360.15  128     
49117
13:11:37        13:16:00        Basic PS        PT4078  6274.57 367.9   64      
98426
13:16:00        13:19:04        Basic PS        PT4082  6273.51 355.52  256     
24528

That is:
For basic PS backup,I can change block size using BLKSIZE in JCL and the 
resulting block count reported by rmm and dss will match, the result is: Bigger 
block size, less block count,backup speed is much quicker
But for extended PS backup,no matter what specified in JCL,the block count 
reported by dss will be same, and it does not match with what's recorded by 
rmm, and speed are same for whatever block size.

Could you explain?

regards
Victor

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to