I could be way off base, but given that the OP just finished a thread where the solution was a mass/conditional zoneedit of his DDDEFs, I would look very closely at which libraries are actually being used and updated by this SMP/E running. An inadvertent mixing of LE levels is scary.
> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Skip Robinson > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:22 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: RSU APPLY ISSUE GIM23911E > > Guilty as charged; I did not dwell on Doug's posts. Installing the same PTF > and > getting a different result raise other questions to be pursued. > There may be a benign explanation that IBM could supply in an SR. I applied > UI18451 in June and don't see any anomalies the sysout. > > . > . > J.O.Skip Robinson > Southern California Edison Company > Electric Dragon Team Paddler > SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager > 626-302-7535 Office > 323-715-0595 Mobile > jo.skip.robin...@sce.com > > > > From: Doug Henry <doug_he...@usbank.com> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, > Date: 09/04/2014 09:30 AM > Subject: Re: RSU APPLY ISSUE GIM23911E > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> > > > > On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 07:32:54 -0700, Skip Robinson > <jo.skip.robin...@sce.com> wrote: > > >The output shows this: > > > > IN LMOD CEEPLPKA IN THE SCEERUN LIBRARY. THE RETURN CODE (04) > > EXCEEDED THE ALLOWABLE VALUE. DATE 14.247 - TIME 02:35:37 > > > >It's not at all uncommon for the binder to return code 04 for various > >reasons that are not actually 'problems'. In this case we see messages > >about conflicting module attributes. This happens. Life goes on. It's way > >less dangerous than, say, global warming. > > > >The real problem here is that SMPE is being too prissy. If 04 'exceeded > >the allowable value', then the allowable value is set too low. 04 is only > >a warning after all. Go into the SMPE dialog and examine the GLOBAL > >UTILITY options for entry LKED. If it says 'RETURN CODE: 0', you will > >incur never ending grief now and in the future. Because of your LKED > >entry, SMPE turns 04 into 08. > > > >Our 2.1 SMPE environment has already been tailored for us, so I can't > tell > >how it came out of the box. Now it's set to 'RETURN CODE: 4', which we've > >used for as long as I can remember. This way we get 08 only for real > >problems. > > Hi Skip, > If you read my previous reply's you will know that I sucessfully applied > UI18451 just to test this for him this morning. However he is running into > some fundamental problem . The bind of CEEPLPKA should result in a return > code 0 (not 4). I also have my binder global option set to 4 but that is > irrelevent in this problem because it is being overridden by the lmod > Return Code subentry (it specifies 0). The problem seems to be with the > entries that are autoinclude by the binder don't seem to have the proper > rent reus flag set. As I said before an example is the module STRXFRM that > should be RENT, REUS, REFR . > > IEW2322I 1220 1272 NAME CEEPLPKA(R) MAX > ACCEPTABLE RC=00 > > Doug > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
