Thanks all for reply. Now to resolve this issue, I tried running below more steps.
1) I run APPLY CHECK Job without HOLDERROR included in it. Job failed with RC 08 GIM69168E ** HFSCOPY PROCESSING TO THE SIZUFSC LIBRARY FAILED FOR HFS IZUGNAAC IN SYSMOD UI16044. THE RETURN CODE (12) EXCEEDED THE ALLOWABLE VALUE. DATE 14.247 - TIME 23:39:39 - SEQUENCE NUMBER 000025. GIM30216I APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16044. SYSTEM UTILITY PROCESSING FAILED FOR AN ELEMENT IN UI16044. GIM30219E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI18572. PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16044, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER PRE OPERAND. GIM30221E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16025. PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16044, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER REQ OPERAND. GIM30221E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16026. PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16044, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER REQ OPERAND. GIM30221E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16027. PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16044, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER REQ OPERAND. GIM30221E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16028. PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16044, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER REQ OPERAND. GIM30221E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16029. PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16044, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER REQ OPERAND. GIM30221E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16030. PROCESSING FAILED FOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Then I tried looking at UI16044 PTF in SMPPTS and this is basically for z/OSMF and we are not using this product.So, I tried EXCLUDING and run Job again. This time it failed with GIM30204E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI18572. REQUIRED SYSMODS WERE EXCLUDED. GIM35905I PREREQUISITE SYSMOD UI16044 WAS EXCLUDED. And UI18572 also belongs to z/OS MF. So, I EXCLUDED this as well from APLLY CHeck Job and run with RC00. Is it good way to bypass the issue, I am facing or Do I have to solve it now before moving forward. Suggestion Please. On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Tom Marchant < 0000000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 06:56:17 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote: > > >Do not change the CEEPLPKA. IBM sets that and probably requires it to be > a 0 max cc. > > > >So, try the apply without the BYPASS HOLDERROR and see if it works. > > We don't know the state of his system. Those APARs are likely not for LE, > but for > some other component. His APPLY failed, but we don't know what was done > when > he ran the APPLY with BYPASS (HOLDERROR). The PTF(S) with the error holds > may or may not have been applied. > > At this point, I wouldn't trust his system. > > -- > Tom Marchant > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN