Thanks all for reply. Now to resolve this issue, I tried running below more
steps.
1) I run APPLY CHECK Job without HOLDERROR included in it. Job failed with
RC 08
GIM69168E ** HFSCOPY PROCESSING TO THE SIZUFSC LIBRARY FAILED FOR HFS
IZUGNAAC
IN SYSMOD UI16044. THE RETURN CODE (12) EXCEEDED THE ALLOWABLE
VALUE. DATE 14.247 - TIME 23:39:39 - SEQUENCE NUMBER 000025.
GIM30216I APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16044. SYSTEM UTILITY
PROCESSING FAILED FOR AN ELEMENT IN UI16044.
GIM30219E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI18572. PROCESSING FAILED
FOR
SYSMOD UI16044, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER PRE OPERAND.
GIM30221E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16025. PROCESSING FAILED
FOR
SYSMOD UI16044, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER REQ OPERAND.
GIM30221E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16026. PROCESSING FAILED
FOR
SYSMOD UI16044, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER REQ OPERAND.
GIM30221E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16027. PROCESSING FAILED
FOR
SYSMOD UI16044, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER REQ OPERAND.
GIM30221E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16028. PROCESSING FAILED
FOR
SYSMOD UI16044, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER REQ OPERAND.
GIM30221E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16029. PROCESSING FAILED
FOR
SYSMOD UI16044, WHICH WAS SPECIFIED ON THE ++VER REQ OPERAND.
GIM30221E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI16030. PROCESSING FAILED
FOR
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
Then I tried looking at UI16044 PTF in SMPPTS and this is basically for
z/OSMF and we are not using this product.So, I tried EXCLUDING and run Job
again. This time it failed with
GIM30204E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI18572. REQUIRED SYSMODS
WERE
EXCLUDED.
GIM35905I PREREQUISITE SYSMOD UI16044 WAS EXCLUDED.
And UI18572 also belongs to z/OS MF. So, I EXCLUDED this as well from APLLY
CHeck Job and run with RC00.
Is it good way to bypass the issue, I am facing or Do I have to solve it
now before moving forward.
Suggestion Please.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Tom Marchant <
0000000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 06:56:17 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>
> >Do not change the CEEPLPKA. IBM sets that and probably requires it to be
> a 0 max cc.
> >
> >So, try the apply without the BYPASS HOLDERROR and see if it works.
>
> We don't know the state of his system. Those APARs are likely not for LE,
> but for
> some other component. His APPLY failed, but we don't know what was done
> when
> he ran the APPLY with BYPASS (HOLDERROR). The PTF(S) with the error holds
> may or may not have been applied.
>
> At this point, I wouldn't trust his system.
>
> --
> Tom Marchant
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
