Messing with the IPL linklst is inherently dangerous. Using SETPROG ...UPDATE(*) can hose your system into needing an IPL. Updating active linklst datasets (after you get the enqueues out of the way) can hose your system into needing an IPL.
Peter described the safest way, but he also warned it could hose your system into needing an IPL. I don't believe John Eells gave advice on active linklst manipulation. > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 10:58 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: SCEELKED Restore > > Tom Marchant wrote: > > >With the sole exception of Peter Relson's advice, all of them are > wrong. > > Please be kind to tell us where we (and myself too) are wrong? Even > John Eells is wrong too? > > Just curious if you don't mind please. > > Groete / Greetings > Elardus Engelbrecht > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
