On 2014-11-28, at 08:47, R.S. wrote: > > * Using "clock slow down" means fake time. It is not only innacurate, this is > intentional => it is fogery. Would you say in a court "ok we recorded the > transaction, but the time field is fake"? > In the U.S. some states have a constitutional limit on the number of days a legislative session may last. In some cases, the president of the senate has ordered the sergeant-at-arms to stop the clock in the senate chamber at 23:59 on the last day to complete business. I've not heard of any court test of this practice, either:
o Challenging a conviction under a law passed during such an unconstitutional extension (difficult because the legislative record says "23:59"?) or: o Challenging a violation of tavern closing time limits if the alleged violation occurred while time was frozen in the state. On 2014-11-28, at 08:35, Peter Hunkeler wrote: > > I whished anyone would be able to stop that ridiculous and usless > timeshifting twice a year. > Bad paradigm for IT implementation. Nothing should be viewed as "shifting twice a year." Rather the paradigm should be of a function that maps linear time such as TAI (POSIX's choice of UTC was a bad decision) to civil time. That function changes not semiannually, but only in consequence of sporadic legislative action; an extreme example being in Independent Samoa in 2011. > Did you know that Swiss people actually had a voting back in the late 70's or > early 80's if we do want to start this glorious thing? We decided no we do > not. Our Government ignored this and daylight saving was introduced. > In the country that takes pride in being the world's oldest democracy? What am I missing? > I admit it would have been a funny situation to be a single small country not > switching to DST while all countries around us do..... > Vaguely reminiscent of Sweden's chaotic adoption of the Gregorian Calendar. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_calendar On 2014-11-28, at 04:53, Peter Hunkeler wrote: > > ... we cannot get commitment from the application side that each and every > application is either using UTC or that it can cope with duplicate time > stamps. > Who signs their paychecks? Another "requirement" that reminds me of Cnut. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN