Charles (and others)
Has LE obsconded with SDSF's *RESERVED* use of ISA prefix?
Ed
On May 28, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Well that would make sense ...
In my case the program does not ABEND if some function -- also
relative branch -- is called first rather than ISAUTH, which makes
no sense at all.
I have not tried every possibility, for example
- what if I called some other function rather than ISAUTH at the
early point in the C++ logic where I call (or comment out the call
to) ISAUTH?
- what if I called ISAUTH later in the program, after other
functions had been called successfully?
Seems to me if I were writing a "how much heap actually got used"
tool I would just initialize the whole heap to X'DEADBEEF' or
X'8BADF00D' or something and then at EOJ search from the top for
the end of the initial value. But what do I know.
Charles
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-
m...@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Andy Wood
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)
On Thu, 28 May 2015 07:56:03 -0700, Charles Mills
<charl...@mcn.org> wrote:
. . .
I would assume C++ gets the stack at startup, not on the first
external
call. Interesting thought.
I have this very vague recollection, that when RPTSTG is ON, things
are set up so that the stack is always too small (or gives that
appearance), so that routine gets called every time.
However, it has been a very long time since I was near anything
like that, things may have changed, and perhaps I had the story
wrong in the first place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
