Shane Ginnane wrote: >>The information APAR says there is a possible GRSRNLxx configuration. I >>suppose is not dangerous. It's a IBM APAR.
>Suppose again. That APAR is *very* specific to catalogs and the way they are >processed. It is *NOT* generic for sharing outside a GRSplex. Shane, it is a good catch! Thanks for mentioning this. To Jorge Garcia: I would, as others suggested, recommend that you update your one IODF and copy it to other Sysplex(es). Because of the very serious scars others mentioned, I don't allow in RACF access of ALTER for datasets residing in other Syplex catalogs and volsers. Some of our usercatalogs are shared, but datasets are accessible amongst Sysplexes as long ALTER work is done on the Sysplex where that dataset is originally created. This includes IODF datasets too. You could proceed if you wish, but it is not my dog. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
