My bad for not clarifying what I meant by 'sharing'. The reason I wanted structure-sharing is that--at least back when this all started in the 90s--sysplex sharing makes certain changes available immediately to all members without having to issue REFRESH on every system. Not sure if that difference is still in effect...
. . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 626-302-7535 Office 323-715-0595 Mobile jo.skip.robin...@sce.com -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Thomas Conley Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 1:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Different Security Products in a Sysplex On 7/29/2015 4:33 PM, J O Skip Robinson wrote: > Interesting. At the time we crafted the bronze-plex, I could not see any way > to share multiple RACF databases within a sysplex because AFAIK RACF sharing > requires fixed structure names: IRRXCF00_P001 and IRRXCF00_B001. Has that > requirement changed? If not, I don't see how I could share two different > databases. As it is, two guys share one database using those structures, > while the third guy uses a different database non-shared, i.e. no structure > needed. > > . > . > . > J.O.Skip Robinson > Southern California Edison Company > Electric Dragon Team Paddler > SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager > 626-302-7535 Office > 323-715-0595 Mobile > jo.skip.robin...@sce.com > I'm pretty sure we did not caysh the RACF database. As I remember, the sysplex sharing bits were not enabled in ICHRDSNT. Regards, Tom Conley ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
