Yes, I would agree. CBPDO and any other native SMP/E installs are faster
and more user-controllable than 'PAC' ones. CP
william janulin wrote:
I have used both and found that the CBPDO is an easier install. Too many variables with SERVERPAC.
Bill J.
On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 11:11 AM, Paul Flynn <pfl...@rs.com> wrote:
We're getting ready to put in our order for z/OS 2.2. We're having an internal
debate regarding whether we should order it as a CBPDO or a ServerPac. We've
always done ServerPacs in the past but we're told that we can order a CBPDO one
week earlier. We're very anxious to have the GA code so we're considering
CBPDO.
Has anyone here had experience with both install methods? We've certainly done
CBPDOs but not for z/OS. I was wondering whether the install process was
considerably more labor intensive than a ServerPac and thus making the one week
advantage moot.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
