On 20 November 2015 at 14:41, Paul Gilmartin < 0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> >You're sure your caller didn't allocate with FREE=CLOSE ? > > > No, I'm not sure. > > I shouldn't have implied "caller" The DDNAME was "passed" in a reply > from the SDSF API. So I wish there were an option to suppress "FREE=CLOSE. Dynalloc concatenate a DD DUMMY to it...? The JCL book says: *FREE=CLOSE* is ignored when: - The data set is a member of a concatenated group Not clear if concatenating after a dynalloc with FREE=CLOSE will inhibit it. Seems reasonable that it would. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
