On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:23:28 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
>Dynalloc concatenate a DD DUMMY to it...? The JCL book says:
>
> *FREE=CLOSE* is ignored when:
>
> - The data set is a member of a concatenated group
>
>Not clear if concatenating after a dynalloc with FREE=CLOSE will inhibit
>it. Seems reasonable that it would.
>
In fact, it does. This feels as if a remark applies here that someone lately
made about use of GDGs:
"But that's not what it's for!"
But it seems to work. And I use PERMC so I can later clean everything up
with a single FREE.
Thanks,
gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
