On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:23:28 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote: > >Dynalloc concatenate a DD DUMMY to it...? The JCL book says: > > *FREE=CLOSE* is ignored when: > > - The data set is a member of a concatenated group > >Not clear if concatenating after a dynalloc with FREE=CLOSE will inhibit >it. Seems reasonable that it would. > In fact, it does. This feels as if a remark applies here that someone lately made about use of GDGs:
"But that's not what it's for!" But it seems to work. And I use PERMC so I can later clean everything up with a single FREE. Thanks, gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN