ERBRMFPP

Comes free.

See the RMF USER'S GUIDE



















-
-teD
-
  Original Message  
From: Lizette Koehler
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 08:50
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: SMF/RMF Reporting question

Do you have any tools like SAS/MICS or SAS/MXG?
Any monitoring tools like Tivoli Omegamon, MainView?

Lizette


> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Hardee, Chuck
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 5:23 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: SMF/RMF Reporting question
> 
> Hello Everyone,
> 
> I am trying to find, from a historical perspective, that is to say, after an
event has
> occurred, what units of work were using how much of the available CPU.
> Is there an SMF and/or RMF report that allows on to ask,
> 
> "During the interval from hh:mm to hh:mm on a particular day, in increments of
y
> units, what was the consumption of CPU on a unit of work basis?"
> 
> Another way to put it is, I am looking for a report that shows CPU consumption
in a
> context similar to the SDSF DA screen as one sits at their terminal and
presses the
> enter key.
> 
> We are trying to find out who, during a specific interval of the day, was
consuming
> the greatest amount of CPU to the ultimate effect that it essentially stopped
one of
> our database regions from executing and thereby causing it to think some of
its
> subtasks had gone into a runaway CPU condition so it aborted them as a
preemptive
> action against bad coding. We know that the code is good, it's been literally
running
> for years with no changes and, until the last couple of weeks, has had not a
single
> hiccup. Over the last couple of weeks, for no reason we can identify as of
yet, the
> code has randomly been aborted by the database software in which it runs, as a
> runaway task.
> 
> The theory is that the runaway check process is actually reporting a false
condition
> since it is based on wall clock time (this is vendor code, not ours and I'm
not going to
> debate it one way or another). What the vendor theorizes is that another task
in the
> system, yet to be identified, has stolen the CPU away from the database and
held on
> to it long enough such that when the database finally regained access to the
CPU,
> the runaway interval had been exceeded by the internal task executing our code
so it
> was aborted for a potential loop within the code.
> 
> The database vendor has suggested looking for this kind of information in
order to
> confirm or deny that the database had the CPU it needed or if another task
within
> the LPAR had control. If we find that the database had the CPU, then the
vendor has
> more analysis work to do on the dump with a more powerful magnifying glass, or
we
> have to turn our sights on someone else, either ourselves or, possibly,
another
> vendor for another product.
> 
> Thanks for any thoughts you may have on this.
> Chuck
> 
> 
> Charles (Chuck) Hardee<mailto:chuck.har...@thermofisher.com>
> Senior Systems Engineer/Database Administration EAS Information Technology
> 
> Thermo Fisher Scientific
> 300 Industry Drive | Pittsburgh, PA 15275 Phone +1 (724) 517-2633 | Mobile +1
(412)
> 877-2809 | FAX: +1 (412) 490-9230
> chuck.har...@thermofisher.com<mailto:chuck.har...@thermofisher.com> |
> www.thermofisher.com
> 
> WORLDWIDE CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: Dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient,
or an
> employee or agent of a system responsible for delivering the message to the
> intended recipient, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
please inform
> the sender and delete all copies.
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
> lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to