In
<CAAJSdjhXJSn-JYq_0awmCcL+ND6cdddV3EiTD0WJz2Sn4Qc-=g...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 11/23/2015
at 09:02 AM, John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> said:
>But if the optimizer actually "recompiles"
>the object code into new object code, then doesn't that new object
>code need to be as thoroughly tested as the original, unoptimized,
>code?
Yes.
>So, is the sequence now: code, compile, optimize, test?
If you have the correct source code and the current compiler then you
don't need ABO unless there is some reason that you can't use the
current compiler for production.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
