In
<CAAJSdjh-Oh==ZxzZ=ZgZowG=708CPtcHZoxmy3p3Lz2za1=j...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 12/09/2015
at 11:48 AM, John McKown <[email protected]> said:
> OK, I've managed to confuse myself. You want the ENQ for SYSDSN
>to include the volser if and only if the DSORG is a PDS, otherwise
>to omit it?
No; the queestion is whether the original code was a design flaw, not
whether it is feasible to correct it today, and ISPF, not Allocation.
>Again, think 360/30(?) running OS/360 MFT.
I might believe PCP, but IAK it's an ISPF issue, not Allocattion, so
SYSDSN is not the problem. As others have noted, you can't include the
volser in SYSDSN because you don't know it in time. --
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
