On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:30:25 -0500, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote: >At 10:29 -0700 on 12/08/2015, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: Inquire >intrdr default job class: > >>ISPF EDIT has some effective techniques for serializing updates to >>PDS members, precluding two programmers' editing the same member >>simultaneously. > >Does the ISPF EDIT support take into account that the "Same Member" >means the same PDS not just any PDS with the same name but different >volumes? Using the PDS name without qualifying it with the VOLSER >where it resides is the same problem/design-flaw which ENQ on SYSDSN >has since it leads to False Positive errors claiming the resource is >in use due to not bothering to take into account the volume where a >dataset resides. > I wonder whether IBM knows about that.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
