Here is what the JCL manual z/OS MVS JCL Reference SA23-1385-00 Location in
the JCL states:
A SET statement can appear anywhere in the job after the JOB statement with the
following restrictions:
It must appear in the job's JCL before the intended use of the symbolic
parameter.
It must follow a complete JCL statement.
It cannot appear immediately after the first DD statement within a
concatenation.
Examples: The following JCL will work.
//DD1 DD DSN=dsnA,DISP=SHR
// DD DSN=dsnB,DISP=SHR
// SET
// DD DSN=dsnC,DISP=SHR
The following JCL will fail.
//DD1 DD DSN=dsnA,DISP=SHR
// SET
// DD DSN=dsnB,DISP=SHR
// DD DSN=dsnC,DISP=SHR
The way I read it, the FIRST DD statement in a concatenation cannot have a SET
following. But the next one can.
So in your JCL you seem to have a concatenation of
//DD2 DD *
// DD PATH='/dev/./null'
According to the text above, you would have to put the SET after the DD PATH or
before the DD * but not immediately after the DD * statement.
I would expect this to work:
// SET
//DD2 DD *
// DD PATH='/dev/./null'
I would also expect this to work:
//DD2 DD *
// DD PATH='/dev/./null'
// SET
// DD DISP=SHR,...
I would NOT expect this to work:
//DD2 DD *
// SET
// DD PATH='/dev/./null'
Though I could be wrong. Sometimes IBM documentation is misleading. To me the
behavior is along the lines of this documentation. To verify, you could change
the DD * to a dataset and see if it still fails.
Lizette
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 8:41 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Where is SET allowed in JCL?
>
> Sometimes within a DD concatenation; sometimes not. For example:
>
> 3 //STEP EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
> //*
> 4 //DD1 DD *
> 5 // DD PATH='/dev/./null'
> 6 // SET V1=WOMBAT
> 7 // DD PATH='/dev/./null'
> //*
> 8 //DD2 DD *
> 9 // SET V2=WOMBAT
> 10 // DD PATH='/dev/./null'
> 11 //
> STMT NO. MESSAGE
> 10 IEFC019I MISPLACED DD STATEMENT
>
> Why does it report IEFC019I at statement 10, but not at statement 7?
>
> I had grown accustomed to placing SET in complex concatenations, near a
> reference for clarity. Today was the first time I tried it after DD *.
>
> Should I submit an RCF requesting clarification or an SR for inconsistent
> behavior?
>
> I hate JCL!
>
> -- gil
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
