On 12/23/2015 8:50 AM, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
Is a return code of 4 more appropriate for PTFs not applied because of
error hold?
This is an interesting idea, which I'm curious to hear opinions on. If
doing a mass APPLY (not using the SELECT operand), and PTFs are stopped
because of a PE (ERROR HOLD), either directly or in a requisite chain
that is stuck because of a PE, what RC should be used to identify this
condition? RC=8? 4? 0? Other ideas?
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development
Kurt,
I'm OK with the 08.
Regards,
Tom Conley
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
