In
<29b16432403d6c45a9bee5f0302d191779b9f...@vss-exchmb1.sfg.corp.LOCAL>,
on 12/23/2015
at 05:27 PM, "Pommier, Rex" <rpomm...@sfgmembers.com> said:
>Maybe in way of compromise, SMP/E should set a RC=6 instead of 8
>where maintenance is stopped due to an error hold. :-)
How does an error hold differ from a system hold?
I'd like an RC08 if a sysmod in SELECT can't go on do to a hold of any
type, and an RC04 if a sysmod not in a SELECT can't go on due to a
hold, regardless of the type of hold. PARM options to control cc
setttings wouldn't hurt.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
