BAKR/PR does take a lot more time then STM/LM, but most times you can't just 
use STM/LM, you also have a GETMAIN/FREEMAIN for a register save area and other 
setup/restore things to do.

So, once you factor in those other overheads, which is faster?  I don't know as 
I haven't set up the tests to validly compare the different methods possible.  
I have seen several different ways to avoid the GETMAIN/FREEMAIN overheads.

Chris Blaicher
Technical Architect
Software Development
Syncsort Incorporated
50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
P: 201-930-8234  |  M: 512-627-3803
E: cblaic...@syncsort.com

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Leonardo Vaz
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 1:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSVFETCH exit

Well, I guess using the linkage stack is cleaner because the state of the 
caller is preserved.

Thanks for your reply, that is what I wanted to know, I was going to use STM 
but I remember reading somewhere before (maybe linkedin?) that they would never 
approve any assembler code written in the past 20 years starting with STM  
R14,R12,12(R13). I just would like to hear someone that would prefer BAKR and 
why.

Thanks,
Leo

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSVFETCH exit

On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:52:03 +0000, Leonardo Vaz wrote:

>I apologize if the question is silly, but I am wondering if for a
>performance sensitive exit like this one I should use STM/LM instead of
>BAKR/PR. I believe it's "cheaper" to do STM/LM, bur "cleaner" to do BAKR, 
>right?

Why do you think BAKR is "cleaner"?

BAKR/PR is MUCH slower than STM/LM (or STMG/LMG if you are using the high 
halves of any of registers 2-12).

--
Tom Marchant

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

________________________________



ATTENTION: -----

The information contained in this message (including any files transmitted with 
this message) may contain proprietary, trade secret or other confidential 
and/or legally privileged information. Any pricing information contained in 
this message or in any files transmitted with this message is always 
confidential and cannot be shared with any third parties without prior written 
approval from Syncsort. This message is intended to be read only by the 
individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the 
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that 
any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this message, in any form, is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately notify the sender and/or Syncsort and destroy all copies of this 
message in your possession, custody or control.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to