You can circumvent the problem by detaching signal handling with
BPX1MSD. Trouble with that is if you get an ABEND LE condition handling
does not get control and the dumps are useless.
How come you're not using pthreads for you subtasks?
On 21/03/2016 3:41 PM, Robin Atwood wrote:
No, only one TCB can have POSIX(ON), the others get a failure in BPX1MSS,
rc=156, rsn= 0D07020.
Robin
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: 18 March 2016 21:12
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Linking C module with SSL
And you can't just compile them with POSIX(ON)?
Charles
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Robin Atwood
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 5:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Linking C module with SSL
Charles -
We are already attaching C programs to each other, the problem seems to be the
POSIX option is not inherited.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
