On Thu, 19 May 2016 13:57:41 -0500, Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA) wrote: >I would like to encourage everyone on these listservs to check out these two >RFE's and please vote for them - let's "nudge" IBM into doing them: > I have voted for both of these. I think. How does one indicate strength of interest (1-2-3-4-5)? I couldn't find that.
>TSO Pipes > >http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=47699 > That's a weak "yes" for me. But it shouldn't be "similar to CMS"; it should rely on reusable code as much as possible, for portability/compatibility/synchronized maintenance. >also for StreamIO > >http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=47742 > That's a strong "yes". I'd add a couple things: o Stream I/O is already supported in compiled Rexx, but only for Classic data sets, and in OMVS interpreted, but only for UNIX files. Both should be supported everywnere. o The standard SIGNAL ON NOTREADY should be part of the requirement. (That can't be done in a function package.) (Can you amend?) There's some overlap here; it should be possible to bridge stream I/O to the putative TSO Pipelines. Thanks, gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
