"Are you changing the requirement ex post facto?" I don't think so. The OP wanted to read all the members of a program source library, one after another, as if concatenated within a single sequential dataset.
Of course, I could be wrong. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 17, 2016, at 18:29, Paul Gilmartin <0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu<mailto:0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>> wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:04:33 +0000, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: If 'card image' is defined as FB-80, then yes it is, but the data is full of control info used to rebuild the PDS members. If 'card image' means literally a one for one representation of the original data, then no. Frankly I had lost track of what OP needed. And if the original data aren't F 80, there's no solution. IIRC, OP wanted to search a PDS (of unstated attributes) for references to (a )certain load module(s). -----Original Message----- From: J R Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 3:00 PM But not the original card images. I thought there are control data at the beginning of each record which staggers the original card images progressively through the dataset. Are you changing the requirement ex post facto? It also can't be created on an 029 keypunch without using the MULT PCH key, nor with ISPF Edit without using HEX ON. Actuallly, FB;80;3120. It is. On Jun 17, 2016, at 16:58, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: ... XMIT with corresponding RECEIVE is a very handy way to flatten out and later re-inflate a PDS. But perhaps not legible enough to suit the OP's objective. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
