On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 22:04:42 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote: > >>It's worse than that. One may safely use those characters that are called >>in manuals Alphabetic, Numeric, or Special. They're enumerated. all others >>are considered Invalid. Alphabetic does *not* include lower case. > >I doubt this is still correct information. After all, even z/OS base >components issue WTOs in mixed case. ZFS is one that comes to my mind, and I'm >pretty sure there are more but I can't name them without looking up. > What about WTOR? You mention ZFS (ITYM zFS; they're not the same.) and UNIX filesystems are case-sensitive. And I believe any NFS is required to have an all-majuscule handle, useful for little besides operator commands.
And I still wonder about those pesky half-Katakana or half-Cyrillic terminals. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
