On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:52:40 +0000, Way, Richard wrote: >Sorry, correction of my clarification (not that anyone probably much cares >that much anymore, but I do want to be accurate) - delete "open source" >from the sentence below and replace with "IBM component". > >Rich Way > >-----Original Message----- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On >Behalf Of Way, Richard >Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 11:05 AM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: SMP/E packaging question > >Sorry for the lack of response - I was out of the office for a couple of days. >Apparently it's a long story, predating my tenure here, but has to do with >including some open source object code and not being certain about SMP >picking up all of the dependencies should any of those modules change. >"Sub-optimal", I know.
Ok, so if I understand correctly, you have an SMP/E packaged product that includes a load module. That load module was created using SMP/E without an alias that it should have. You then link that load module outside of SMP/E to include an IBM component. Here are more questions. Was the load module linked correctly by SMP/E? I assume not because you seem to have identified that the JCLIN was missing the alias. When you link the module after APPLY outside of SMP/E, do you link it back into the SMP/E target library or into another PDS? In any case, the JCLIN that you provide to SMP/E for this LMOD will not cause the second link outside of SMP/E to have the alias. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
