Charles, It doesn't appear that the register conventions for XPLINK and non-XPLINK are compatible. If one were marketing an Assembler API would you have to deliver two versions? One XPLINK and one non-XPLINK?
Janet >@Janet, it occurred to me that you are talking about both C and "XGR." That to >me implies that you are calling assembler from C (or perhaps vice >versa) -- >is that right? >If so, do you know that XPLINK (which I believe is implied by AMODE 64) is >something you *do* have to know about? It's another brave new world: >you >can't just do STM R14,R12,12(R13) any more. >Search the KC for EDCXPRLG. >Charles ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
