I'm confused and mystified. We run GDPS for DR on a standalone sysplex. I'm not sure what (if anything) we do with logger there, but the task is definitely running on the K system.
IXG601I 09.19.25 LOGGER DISPLAY SYSTEM LOGGER STATUS SYSTEM SYSTEM LOGGER STATUS ------ -------------------- X1 ACTIVE . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 323-715-0595 Mobile 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW robin...@sce.com -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 4:28 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: Confusing info about System Logger and GDPS K-systems Hi Steve, Thanks fort the hint. The 2 apars seem (to me) to solve a situation caused by the new ALLOWACCESS(NO) parameter. Kees. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Horein Sent: 10 January, 2017 12:58 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Confusing info about System Logger and GDPS K-systems These new function APARs may shed some light: OA50781 and OA50775 They talk about secondary controlling systems (KSYS) being present within the SYSPLEX, and IPL order. I hope this helps! On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM < kees.verno...@klm.com> wrote: > Hello, > > We run GDPS V3R13 and z/OS V2.2. > I am reading the GDPS recommendations (in the GDPS/PPRC V3R13 > Installation and Customization Guide) about System Logger, which, as > seems usual with each GDPS release, have changed again. > > Now I read some confusing and/or contradicting information (Ch 2.6). > > * The recommendation remains to not run System Logger on GDPS > K-systems. GDPS will kill it if found. > > * There is a new IXGCNFxx member with parameters for System Logger. > > * The GDPS manual recommends ("To prevent XCFAS on the Controlling > systems from allocating the LOGR CDS") to specify MANAGE > ALLOWACCESS(NO) in IXGCNFxx on GDPS K-systems. > > What is the use of the last recommendation? > > * IXGCNFxx is used by System Logger, which is not started there, > so it will never be processed. > > * Why would XCFAS access the LOGR CDS if not directed so by System > Logger? > > * If yet so, how would XCFAS know about the XCFCNFxx restriction? > > DISPLAY LOGGER,IXGCNF,MANAGE > IXG602I DISPLAY LOGGER COMMAND NOT PROCESSED, THE SYSTEM LOGGER IS NOT > ACTIVE. > > Am I missing something? > > Regards, > Kees. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
