In this case, because it is the behaviour of the header record (which for one I'm assuming is the first record), these would only be potential issues if the file only consisted of the header, no other records.
Of course, the header record can be a coincidence. In changing the code, the size of On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:39:11 -0700, Sri h Kolusu <skol...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >>>> The programmer added code to bypass the header record on the first >file read, now it runs at the development level. > >You may want to check this out > >http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21242182 > > >Kolusu > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
