Remember, the AMBLIST Module Summary has been checked and confirmed. Even if NORENT is not used, dynamic CALLs, multiple load modules, how would they look the same, and yet have such a difference?
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 16:27:14 -0500, Farley, Peter x23353 <peter.far...@broadridge.com> wrote: >But a COBOL V4.2 recompile with compiler option DATA(31) will put >WORKING-STORAGE in 31-bit address ranges rather than 24-bit, causing the >24-bit assembler program to fail S0C4. > >I think that is the OP's real issue, but he has to verify the compiler options >actually used for the recompile. > >Peter > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
