Could you tell if the CEEPARMS are used and the whether or not the parms allow OVERRIDE?
Some shops code LE so that parms (or some parms) are not able to be over ridden by the user. If you have access, do a D CEE command (look up syntax) to display what is available. Lizette > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Greg Boyd > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 8:48 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Where's my dump? > > I've tried specifying lots of different parms in the CEEOPTS DD without > success. > > Today I tried something completely different. My code is very simple, I > define a bunch of variables in working storage and then invoke an ICSF API. I > do a couple of displays before and after the call, but the call is abending > with the S0C4. > > I added 4 instructions to the code. The first three simply define 3 new > variables, one of which is initialized to 0. Immediately before the ICSF API > call, I perfrom a DIVIDE by 0, which results in a S0C9 AND THE DUMP BEING > GENERATED in the CEEDUMP DD. > > Commenting out the DIVIDE by 0 instruction, the job abends with the S0C4 and > no dump. The only difference between the two runs is the DIVIDE by 0 > instruction. > > Interestingly, with the Abend0C9, the joblog includes IEA995I, which displays > 'USER COMPLETION CODE=4039'. I believe the U4039 is a result of LE > percolating the S0C9. With the S0C4, the job log shows only IEF450I, which > simply displays 'ABEND=S0C4'. > > So, I'm guessing that LE is getting control after the S0C9 and generating the > dump with the U4039, but with the S0C4, LE is being bypassed and no dump is > created. > > I also tried specifying the ABTERMENC option in the CEEOPTS input. Specifying > ABEND did not generate a dump. Specifying ABTERMENC(RETCODE) did change the > Abend S0C4 to return code=3000, but there still was no dump. > > Does this provide any more clues to why the dump is not being generated? Is > there another option to tell LE to process the abend and generate the dump for > the S0C4? > > Thanks! > Greg Boyd > www.mainframecrypto.com > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:29:28 +0100, Peter Hunkeler <p...@gmx.ch> wrote: > > >Have you tried > >//CEEOPTS DD * TERMTHDACT(UAIMM,,96)/* > > > >The system will use the *last* dump dd statement out of //SYSABEND, > //SYSUDUMP and //SYSMDUMP found in the step to decide how to format (or not) > and where to write the dump. With the above option, you should get s system > dump but not a CEEDUMP. > > > >Note that the system might suppress a dump to //SYSMDUMP if DAE thinks this > is a dulicate. You should have a corresponding message in the jobs log it this > is the case. > > > > > >-- > >Peter Hunkeler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
