There is no one standard for Parmlib members and comments. You would need to see what the DB2 syntax is for this member.
Some SYS1.PARMLIB members will take comments and some will not. It was dependent on the group (DB2 in this case) that created the process. If it is modeled on a member like SCHEDxx then you might look at SCHEDxx syntax. If you have not done so, you might want to post on the DB2 List. To join, go to IDUG.ORG Lizette -----Original Message----- >From: Juergen Kehr <kehrjuer...@t-online.de> >Sent: Feb 22, 2017 10:16 AM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Question about PARMDD > >Hello, > >since a while we're using the new PARMDD keyword for our DB2 subsystems. > >Here an example: >//DB31MSTR PROC >//IEFPROC EXEC PGM=DSNYASCP, >// PARMDD=ZPARMDD, >// DYNAMNBR=119, >// REGION=0K, >// ACCT=(6590,DB31MSTR) >//STEPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=LNK.DSN.SDSNEXIT.RZ&RZ.DB3 >//BSDS1 DD DISP=SHR,DSN=RZ&RZ..DB31.BSDS01 >//BSDS2 DD DISP=SHR,DSN=RZ&RZ..DB31.BSDS02 >//ZPARMDD DD DISP=SHR,DSN=PP.DSN.PARMLIB(DB31MSTR) > >Reason for doing so is, that we now can change the DB2 ZPARMS without any >changes in SYS1.PROCLIB (or another PROCLIB), we have to change the >PP.DSN.PARMLIB instead. SYS1.PROCLIB and PP.DSN.PARMLIB may have different >RACF profiles, what is the case in our installation. > >My question now is: Is it possible to have any comments in the PARMLIB member >(here: DB31MSTR)? > >The content now is ZPARM(DSNZP310),GROUP(DSNDB3),MEMBER(DB31) > >Thanks in advance for any help. > >Kind regards >Juergen > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
