Using 0M can cause other issues. If the task abends and there is not enough below the line storage (usually about 2M is needed) for abend processing, strange and fun things can occur.
I prefer to know what is needed and what can be coded. I have some tasks where I have the user use 256M Lizette -----Original Message----- >From: Steve Beaver <st...@stevebeaver.com> >Sent: Feb 23, 2017 12:17 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: Cobol - S80A abend > >Change jobcard to REGION=OM > >That usually fixes 99% of the problems > >Steve > >-----Original Message----- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On >Behalf Of scott Ford >Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 12:37 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Cobol - S80A abend > >All: > >I have a question about error recovery and here is the situation. > >1. Cobol STC calls an assembler module which passes > a RACF command using IRRSEQ00 >2. The customer has a large profile, over 32K 3. We are seeing a S80A in >'IRRSEQ00' > >Now the question, I know I can write a Cobol Condition Handler, but since the >abend is occurring in an assembler module, can i change the Assembler called >to do a ESTAE ..? I want to be able to note the S80A abend but still recovery. > I am being realistic ? > >What I am not sure of is that the S80A will percolate down where a Cobol >condition handler will catch it. I am in a void in this area and need some >help. > >Best Regards, >Scott > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
