>As this is an STC, I assume it can run this IRRSEQ00 call numerous times. If >that is the case, would it make sense to have two ASM programs, and have the >first (called from COBOL) attach the second, specifying SZERO=NO and have the >subtask issue the IRRSEQ00 call? By doing it in a subtask, that only shares >minimal subpools, you could reduce the amount of orphaned storage laying >around.
While this may help avoiding the S80A ABENDs at first, it will not remove the storage leak. -- Peter Hunkeler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
