Here is an IBM presentation on how to tune z/OS and DB2 memory,
including some parameters to set.
http://www.mdug.org/Presentations/Large%20Memory%20DB2%20Perf%20MDUG.pdf

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Art Gutowski <arthur.gutow...@gm.com> wrote:
> Did someone on this thread say DB2??
>
> We have been experiencing similar AUX storage creep on our DB2 systems, 
> particularly during LARGE reorgs (more of a gallop than a creep).  Our DB2 
> guys did some research, opened an ETR with IBM, and found this relic:
>
> Q:
> "[Why was] set realstorage_management to OFF when that zPARM was introduced 
> in DB2 version 10?
>
> "Details
> "IBM z/OS implemented a Storage Management Design change after DB2 v10 was 
> released.
> "•      Before the design change, DB2 used KEEPREAL(NO), virtual storage 
> pages were really (physically) freed, high CPU cost if YES
> DISCARDDATA KEEPREAL(NO), RSM has to get LPAR level serialization to manage 
> those pages that are being freed immediately. That added to CPU usage and 
> also caused some CPU spin at the LPAR level to get that serialization  -- 
> excerpt from PTF
>
> "To get around/minimize the impact of the original design shortcomings that 
> was introduced by IBM RSM z/OS,  setting zPARM realstorage_management to OFF, 
> would probably have been prudent on most LPARs.  HP/EDS tried to address this 
> new issue IBM created.
>
> "IBM create two PTFs and changed the way DB2 and RSM manages the page frames.
>
> "•      After a design change (now) DB2 uses KEEPREAL(YES), storage is only 
> virtually freed
> "If DB2 doesn't tell RSM that it doesn't need a frame, then the frame will 
> remain backed in real storage in some form. That causes the growth of real 
> storage and paging and everything that goes with using up REAL storage. 
> KEEPREAL(YES) allows DB2 to tell RSM that z/OS can steal the page if it needs 
> it, but DB2 retains ownership of the page, and it remains backed with real 
> storage. If z/OS needs the page, it can steal it -- excerpt from PTF
>
> "V10 APAR PM88804 APAR PM86862 and PM99575"
>
> So...perhaps check your DSNZPARM and make sure it's coded appropriately for 
> more modern times.  FYI, we are z/OS 2.2 and DB2 11.1, NFM.  We are in the 
> process of rolling out REALSTORAGE_MANAGEMENT=AUTO (the current IBM 
> recommended setting) across our enterprise.
>
> HTH,
> Art Gutowski (with assist from Doug Drain, Steve Laufer and IBM)
> General Motors, LLC
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to